Structure of Diplomatic Speeches: Analysis of the UN Security Council Meetings on Ukraine in 2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2491.2026.264Keywords:
diplomatic speech, lie/deception, diplomatic discourse, action frame, theory of semantic primitivesAbstract
The diplomatic discourse at the UN Security Council regarding the Russian invasion of Ukraine presents a unique context to analyze the structure of diplomatic speeches while events are still unfolding.
This article considers diplomatic speech, the main genre of diplomatic discourse in meetings of the UN Security Council. The primary objective of the analysis is to reconstruct the neutral diplomatic speeches and the defensive reactions of diplomats and various invited representatives during the discussion, based on the current situation between Ukraine and Russia. The mentioned speeches were examined in light of the theory of semantic primitives and A. Wierzbicka’s classification of action frames. The conducted analysis highlights the language as a powerful tool to reflect dynamics, intentions, reactions, and strategic positioning in diplomatic interactions.
Additionally, the article explores how representatives from different countries use language to shape their narratives, protect international interests, and influence the international community. Special attention is given to distinguishing the difference between neutral and subjectively colored statements, which provides deeper insight into the mechanisms of covert manipulation and diplomatic strategies. Through an interdisciplinary approach that integrates linguistics, communication theory, and political analysis, the article offers a comprehensive look at contemporary trends in diplomatic discourse during the armed conflict. The role of action frames in building arguments and defining the positions of parties in the international arena is examined in detail. This approach opens new perspectives for studying diplomatic discourse and developing effective strategies for international communication in crisis situations.
Downloads
References
1. Collin, R. (2012). Genre in Discourse, Discourse in Genre. A New Approach to the Study of Literate Practice.Vol. 44. 85 p.
2. D’Acquisto, G. (2017). A linguistic Analysis of Diplomatic Discourse. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 1-30. Retrieved from https://www.cambridgescholars.com/resources/pdfs/978-1-4438-5072-8-sample.pdf
3. Holtseva, М. & Kolesnyk, O. (2022). Lies and deception in modern English diplomatic discourse: pragmatics in interdisciplinary focus. Cogito. Vol. XIV, no. 1p.154-173. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361670143_LIES_AND_DECEPTION_IN_MODERN_ENGLISH_DIPLOMATIC_DISCOURSE_PRAGMATICS_IN_INTERDISCIPLINARY_FOCUS
4. Ivaschenko, V. (2006). Kontseptualna reprezentatsiia frahmentiv znannia v naukovo-mystetskii kartyni svitu (na materiali ukrainskoi mystetstvoznavchoi terminolohii): Monohrafiia. Vydavnychyi Dim Dmytra Buraho [Conceptual representation of fragments of knowledge in the scientific and artistic picture of the world(based on the material of Ukrainian art history terminology): monograph]. Vydavnychyi Dim Dmytra Buraho [Dmytro Bugaro Publishing House]. 329 p.[in Ukranian]
5. Kha, N. (2020). The types of diplomatic speech and syntagmatic relations of their lexis. An international Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference. 75-76.
6. Lynn, S. (2006). Comparison of Discourse Genres: Clinical Implications. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders. Vol. 33, 126-137. Retrieved from https://pubs.asha.org/doi/pdf/10.1044/cicsd_33_F_126
7. Maintenance of peace and security of Ukraine, (2024, March 15). The Security Council Meetings. Retrieved January 21, 2025, from https://docs.un.org/en/S/PV.9578
8. Maintenance of peace and security of Ukraine, (2024, May 14). The Security Council Meetings. Retrieved January 17, 2025, from https://docs.un.org/en/S/PV.9625
9. Medvid, O. & Podolkova , S. & Vashyst, K. (2024). Linguo-axiological Characteristics of Politico-diplomatic speeches. Philological Treatises, 16(1), 156-167. Retrieved from https://tractatus.sumdu.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/1129
10. Merriam-Webster. (2025). Deception. In Merriam-Webster online dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/deception#:~:text=%3A%20the%20act%20of%20causing%20someone,or%20condition%20of%20being%20deceived
11. Pavlichenko, L. (2022). Diplomacy: Linguistic Tendencies During the War in Ukraine. Current Issues in the Humanities. Vol. 1, 155-163. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/99797385/Diplomacy_Linguistic_Tendencies_During_the_War_in_Ukraine
12. Pokhrel, S. (2020). Diplomatic Language : An Analysis of Salutations from Speeches used in International Diplomacy. Journal of International Affairs, 180-193. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/76418881/Diplomatic_Language_An_Analysis_of_Salutations_from_Speeches_used_in_International_Diplomacy
13. The situation in the Middle East, (2024, March 4). The Security Council Meetings. Retrieved January 17, 2025, from https://docs.un.org/en/S/PV.9562
14. Threats to international peace and security, (2024, April 12). The Security Council Meetings. Retrieved January 14, 2025, from https://docs.un.org/en/S/PV.9601
15. Threats to international peace and security, (2024, February 12). The Security Council Meetings. Retrieved January 20, 2025, from https://docs.un.org/en/S/PV.9546
16. Threats to international peace and security, (2024, February 6). The Security Council Meetings. Retrieved January 14, 2025, from https://docs.un.org/en/S/PV.9544
17. Threats to international peace and security, (2024, January 22). The Security Council Meetings. Retrieved January 21, 2025, from https://docs.un.org/en/S/PV.9533
18. Yapparova, V. (2019). Verbal Poloteness as an Important Tool of Diplomacy. Canadian Center of Science and Education, p.57-61. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/76702265/Politeness_Politics_and_Diplomacy
19. Zhabotynska, S. (2006). Posesyvna konstruktsiia i kontseptualni transform. [Possessive construction and conceptual transforms]. Mova. Liudyna. Svit: do 70-ty richchia prof. M.P. Kocherhana. Zbirnyk naukovykh statei [Language. Man. World: To the 70th anniversary of prof. M.P. Kochergan: collection of scientific articles]. 178–192.[in Ukrainian]
20. Zhabotynska, S. (2011). Leksychni polia y neliniina dynamika kohnityvnykh struktur [Lexical fields and nonlinear dynamics of cognitive structures]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu.Seriia filolohichna[Bulletin of Lviv University. Philological Series]. Vypusk 52 [Issue 52]. 3–11.[in Ukrainian]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mariia Holtseva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
