Verbalization of Basic Concepts in President Joe Biden’s 2021 State of the Union Address: a Constructional Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2491.2024.2311

Keywords:

concept, construction, construct, State of the Union address, public speech, Biden

Abstract

The article claims that basic concepts of President Biden’s 2021 State of the Union address are actualised by key constructions, i.e. pairings of form, meaning and function fixed in long-term memory. In speech, constructions are implemented via constructs, combining several constructions to verbalise various objects, events and phenomena. The purpose of this paper is to identify constructions verbalising the basic concepts in President Biden’s 2021 State of the Union address. It has been established that the basic concepts of the State of the Union address are TIME, represented in the introduction to the speech by the constructions ‘in history’ and ‘throughout our history’, CRISIS, actualised by ‘in crisis’, and OPPORTUNITY, embodied by the opportunity-construction. In the main body of the analysed speech, the basic concepts are represented in the segments about the pandemic, employment, family, medicine, finance, environment, violence, immigration and politics. The concept TIME is embodied by constructs indicating exclusivity of the event and uniqueness of the measures taken by the administration, recurrence of the phenomenon over time and the urgent need for change in the society. The concepts CRISIS and OPPORTUNITY are used together in the main body of the address, since CRISIS as a dangerous situation precedes OPPORTUNITY viewed as a probability of eliminating threat. The concept CRISIS is actualised by constructs indicating downward movement, counterforce to the tax system, obstacles to the family or democracy, and the possibility of illegal actions by the rich in financial sphere. The concept OPPORTUNITY is presented as preventing crises: creating a blockage to danger, counteracting a threat, removing obstacles for ordinary Americans in the perspective of employment and taxes, forward movement or renewal in environmental protection.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Гарбера, І. В. (2014). Функціонування терміна «концепт» у сучасній лінгвістиці. Вісник Донецького національного університету. Серія Б: Гуманітарні науки, 1-2, 65-71.

Джеріх, О. С. (2018). «Концепт» у сучасній когнітивній лінгвістиці та лінгвокультурології: поняття та структура. Типологія мовних значень у діахронічному та зіставному аспектах, 35-36, 61-69. https://doi.org/10.31558/2075-2970.2018.35-36.7

Полюжин, М. (2015). Поняття, концепт та його структура. Науковий вісник Східноєвропейського національного університету імені Лесі Українки. Філологічні науки. Мовознавство, 4, 212-222.

Таценко, Н. В. (2009). Засоби реалізації мегаконцептів ПРОСТІР, ЧАС, ІНФОРМАЦІЯ в сучасній англійській мові (на матеріалі інновацій віртуальної реальності) [Автореф. дис. канд. філол. наук, Харків. нац. ун-т імені В.Н. Каразіна]. Інституційний репозитарій Сумського державного університету http://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/3584

Черненко, О. І. (2021). Концептополе ДУХОВНІ ЦІННОСТІ в ідіостилі Віктора Бойка [Дис. канд. філол. наук, Харків. нац. пед. ун-т ім. Г. С. Сковороди]. Інституційний репозитарій Харківського національного педагогічного університету імені Г. С. Сковороди https://dspace.hnpu.edu.ua/items/1fc35027-bdac-4a31-acea-04748c73a4c2

Шевченко, І. С. (2018). Таблоїдність дискурсу американських президентів ХХІ століття. Вісник Харківського національного університету ім. В. Н. Каразіна. Іноземна філологія, 87, 62-68.

Baker, P. (2004). Querying keywords: Questions of difference, frequency, and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 32(4), 346-359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424204269894

Croft, W. (2022). Morphosyntax: Constructions of the World’s Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Diessel, H. (2019). The Grammar Network: How Linguistic Structure is Shaped by Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108671040

Goldberg, A. E. (2019). Explain Me This. Creativity, Competition, and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Haiyue, Y. (2022). A Proximization Study of Critical Discourse Analysis. A Case Study of President Joe Biden’s 2022 State of the Union Address. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities, 17, 328-336. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v17i.674

Hoffmann, T. (2022). Construction Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kamarck, E. (2021). The first 100 days: When did we start caring about them and why do they matter? https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-first-100-days-when-did-we-start-caring-about-them-and-why-do-they-matter/

Shogan, C. J. (2015). The President’s State of the Union Address: Tradition, Function, and Policy Implications. Режим доступу: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R40132.pdf

Tang, B. (2021). Analysis of Political Metaphors in Donald J. Trump’s State of the Union Address in 2020. English Literature and Language Review, 7(4), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.32861/ellr.74.69.73

Youvan, D. (2024). Concealing Vulnerability: The Use of Amphetamines to Mask Dementia Symptoms in an Elderly POTUS During the State of the Union Address. Access at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378824656_Concealing_Vulnerability_The_Use_of_Amphetamines_to_Mask_Dementia_Symptoms_in_an_Elderly_POTUS_During_the_State_of_the_Union_Address

Downloads


Abstract views: 29

Published

2024-12-03

How to Cite

Талавіра, Н. (2024). Verbalization of Basic Concepts in President Joe Biden’s 2021 State of the Union Address: a Constructional Perspective. Studia Philologica, (2 (23), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.28925/2412-2491.2024.2311