Anthropocentric Nature of Figurative Simile and Its Correlation with Metaphor

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-2425.2023.216

Keywords:

figurative simile, metaphor, anthropocentrism, linguo-culture, world picture, comparo ergo sum

Abstract

The article presents an anthropocentric vision of the nature of figurative simile against the background of its correlation with metaphor, since simile, which underlies human cognitive mechanisms and is at the same time the basic structure, mechanism, and operation of virtually all components of the human thought process, still remains an incompletely studied phenomenon. The authors consider simile to be the quintessence of human cognitive activity, since, by creating a person’s imaginary world, it implements the ability to compare fragments of the world picture, which is inherent in the foundations of thinking, and which is a fundamental factor in categorisation and conceptualisation as the main processes of cognition. It has been found that the anthropocentric approach to the analysis of simile is justified in view of the anthropological understanding of this phenomenon as a universe of human thinking and cognition. It is fundamentally important in an anthropocentric view of the essence of simile to recognise that it lies not in the nature of the world, but in the nature of man – in human consciousness, i.e. simile is not just a way of thinking about the world, but also about what is beyond human perception – in metaphysics. It is revealed that human existence is closely connected with simile as a mental operation and an epistemological and semantic category, which is one of the powerful factors that create the inner world of a person – a picture of the world – in the mind. The interpretation of language as a complex “living” system, a creative “spirit of the folk” suggests the existence of the cognitive principle of “comparo ergo sum”. The latter is the source of the anthropocentric charge of simile, because, when cognising the world, a person compares everything to himself and likens everything to himself, which is the reason to consider this principle a separate manifestation of anthropocentrism. This also serves as a basis for defining simile as the main operation of axiological cognition, which is the basis for the formation of value concepts and value judgements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Black, M. (1993). More About Metaphor. In A. Onony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 19–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Davidson, D. (1991). What Metaphors Mean. In S. Davis (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 495–506). New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dobrovol’skij, D. & Piirainen, E. (2005). Figurative Language: Cross-cultural Linguistics and Cross-linguistic Perspectives. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Holman, C. H. (1972). A Handbook to Literature. Indianapolis & New York: The Odyssey Press.

Humboldt, W. (1963). Über den Nationalcharakter der Sprachen. Bd. 3. Darmstadt: Gotta.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Leech, G. N. (1969). A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry. London & New York: Longman.

Mizin, K. I. (2009a). Perspektyva vyvchennia antropotsentrychnosti ustalenykh porivnian (na materiali komparatyvnykh frazeolohii anhliiskoi, nimetskoi, ukrainskoi ta rosiiskoi mov). Linhvistyka. 1(16), 75–81 (in Ukrainian).

Mizin, K. I. (2009b). System Markers of Comparative Phraseology in the Contrastive Perspective. Movoznavstvo. 5, 60–70 (in Ukrainian).

Mizin, K. (2010a). English-Ukrainian Dictionary of Comparative Phraseology. Kremenchuk: Shcherbatykh O.V.

Mizin, K. I. (2010b). Comparo ergo sum or topical linguophilosophical outlook on the nature of comparison. Movoznavstvo. 1(253), 54–67 (in Ukrainian).

Mizin, K. I. (2011). A Human Being in the Mirror of Comparative Phraseology. Kremenchuk: Shcherbatykh O.V. (in Ukrainian).

Post, M. (1981). Comparatives of Identity in English: A Semantic Study. Wroclaw: Wydawn. Uniwersytetu Wroclawskiego.

Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. (2023). How like-simile relates to metaphor: An exploration of analytical parameters. Lege artis. VIII(1), Special issue, 110–128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.34135/lartis.23.8.1.08

Rusanivskyi, V. M. (Co-ed.), Taranenko, O. O. (Co-ed.). (2004). Ukrainska mova: Entsyklopediia. Kyiv: "Ukrainska entsyklopediia" (in Ukrainian).

Schwarz-Friesel, M. (2007). Sprache und Emotion. Tübingen und Basel: A. Francke Verlag.

Smith, E. H. (1882). Similes and Comparisons of Shakespeare (from the Text of the Chiswick Edition of 1826). Philadelphia.

Svartengren, T. H. (1918). Intensifying Similes in English: Inaugural Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Lund: ASC.

Published

2023-12-01

How to Cite

Mizin, K., & Шемуда, М. (2023). Anthropocentric Nature of Figurative Simile and Its Correlation with Metaphor. Studia Philologica, 21(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-2425.2023.216

Issue

Section

Linguistics

Most read articles by the same author(s)